
A distributor wants exclusivity. What will the agreement build?
A regional distributor offers to take your product into accounts you have struggled to reach. It has salespeople, established customer relationships, and a service footprint. In exchange for investing in the launch, it wants an exclusive territory.
For an equipment manufacturer, that can be a significant opportunity. The proposal still needs an operating plan. Expected sales should connect to named responsibilities, account development, product support, and information both parties can use to assess progress.
At Mirabilys, we would start by examining the work each business expects to perform. That provides a basis for discussing the value of exclusivity and the commitments needed to make the relationship productive.
A purchase target says how much the distributor expects to buy. It does not explain how the product will reach customers. The launch may rely on existing accounts, new dealer recruitment, demonstrations, or a small number of large buyers.
Ask the people responsible for the launch to describe the initial account groups, the sales resources assigned, and the sequence of activities. An established network has value when the relevant people are prepared to introduce and support your product.
Your company also has work to do. Product information, demonstration equipment, training, and parts availability may determine when the distributor can begin. Those commitments belong in the same launch schedule as the distributor’s sales activities.
Separate the opening stock purchase from evidence of customer adoption. Active accounts, repeat orders, and inventory movement can help explain what happens after the first shipment. A large initial order should not be expected to answer all of those questions.
Consider a hypothetical US manufacturer. All amounts are US dollars. It currently sells a unit directly for $1,200. The product costs $660, and variable costs specific to direct selling total $210. Its simplified contribution is $330 per unit.
Through distribution, the manufacturer would receive $900 per unit. The product still costs $660, but the variable selling and support costs it retains fall to $75. Contribution becomes $165 per unit.
At those assumptions, 150 direct sales generate $49,500 in contribution. Distribution would need 300 units to generate the same amount: $49,500 divided by $165. This comparison excludes fixed overhead, launch investment, taxes, and cash timing. It does not establish the overall value of the proposed relationship.
Distribution may create access the manufacturer could not build economically on its own. It may also free people to develop products or serve other markets. Those benefits deserve to be examined explicitly, alongside the contribution calculation.
Distinguish new demand from existing sales that would move into the distributor’s account. Both can make sense. They change the economics in different ways, especially if the manufacturer continues performing part of the service work.
The discount granted to a distributor does not prove that a corresponding amount of work has left your company. Technical questions may still reach your engineers. Warranty inspections may still require your facility. Demonstration equipment may still come from your inventory.
Walk through one ordinary order and one order involving a delivery problem. Identify the party responsible at each stage, the party paying the cost, and the information that must move between them.
This is a practical way to expose assumptions before they become part of everyday operations. If both teams expect the other to train the installer, the launch plan needs an owner for that task. If your company retains technical support, the contribution model should include its expected variable cost.
Before finalizing the agreement, prepare a working page with the distributor. Have legal counsel translate the agreed obligations into the contract. The operating brief should make the following items clear.
Market development: Target account groups, assigned people, and launch milestones.
Economics: Prices, retained costs, expected volume, and required launch resources.
Execution: Ordering, inventory, delivery, product training, technical support, and returns.
Visibility: The purchasing, stock, active account, and reorder information the parties can provide and agree to share.
Review: When performance will be examined, which evidence will be used, and which operating adjustments can be considered.
Choose information the teams can actually produce. A sophisticated report has little value if the distributor’s systems cannot supply it. Agreeing on a smaller, reliable record can make the first review substantially more useful.
A distribution relationship may require more inventory, better documentation, and a person responsible for channel support. The manufacturer needs to know how it will provide those resources before the launch begins.
When an agreement affects cash, production, growth, and staffing together, the Sentinel Mandate can provide a starting point for examining those connections. The fee is shared during the discovery call.
Bring the distributor’s proposal, the current unit economics, and an outline of how an order moves through your company. Those materials allow a concrete discussion about what the relationship could build and what each side would need to put in place.
Should we grant exclusivity in exchange for a large opening order?
An opening order proves a purchase happened, not that the product is adopted. Tie exclusivity to the work: target accounts, launch milestones, both sides' commitments, and a review date. That construction is what gives the territory its value.
How do we compare direct sales with the distributor price?
By contribution per unit after the work each side keeps. In the example, $330 direct against $165 through distribution: 300 distributor units match 150 direct sales. The model excludes fixed overhead and cash timing; it frames the discussion rather than settling it.
What belongs in the agreement beyond territory and duration?
The operating brief should cover market development, economics, execution, shared visibility, and performance reviews. The final agreement should also clearly address the conditions for maintaining exclusivity, each party’s responsibilities, and what happens if the agreed commitments are not met. Legal counsel should translate the agreed commercial and operating terms into the contract.
Book a 30-minute discovery call
For owners of 1-20 M$ businesses. A fixed-fee mandate, identical for every client: six weeks, nine components.
